Stonehenge Tribunal of 1222 - Revision history

Mark at 05:40, 27 October 2019

2019-10-27T05:40:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:40, 27 October 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox ars magica}}		{{Infobox ars magica}}

	[[Stonehenge Tribunal]] \| [[Extraordinary ~~Stonehenge~~ Tribunal of ~~1227~~\|Extraordinary Tribunal of ~~1227~~ »]]		[[Stonehenge Tribunal]] \| [[Extraordinary Grand Tribunal of 1226\|Extraordinary Grand Tribunal of 1226 »]]

	In case you feel like reading about a standard Tribunal before the next game, there's an article on [[Tribunal Procedures]].		In case you feel like reading about a standard Tribunal before the next game, there's an article on [[Tribunal Procedures]].

Mark at 17:13, 28 April 2019

2019-04-28T17:13:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 28 April 2019
Line 48:		Line 48:
	== Tribunal Results ==		== Tribunal Results ==

	=== External Tribunal Issues ===		=== Session 1: External Tribunal Issues ===

	; Interference with Mundanes: Phessalia of Merinita v. Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Magni of Flambeau		; Interference with Mundanes: Phessalia of Merinita v. Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Magni of Flambeau
Line 63:		Line 63:
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF THE PACT 50-26		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF THE PACT 50-26

	=== Internal Tribunal Issues ===		=== Session 2: Internal Tribunal Issues ===

	; Obligations to Tribunal: Phessalia of Merinita v. Covenant of Nova Semitae		; Obligations to Tribunal: Phessalia of Merinita v. Covenant of Nova Semitae

Mark at 05:15, 23 April 2019

2019-04-23T05:15:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 23 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox ars magica}}		{{Infobox ars magica}}

	~~''Main Article:~~ [[Stonehenge Tribunal]]''		[[Stonehenge Tribunal]] \| [[Extraordinary Stonehenge Tribunal of 1227\|Extraordinary Tribunal of 1227 »]]

	In case you feel like reading about a standard Tribunal before the next game, there's an article on [[Tribunal Procedures]].		In case you feel like reading about a standard Tribunal before the next game, there's an article on [[Tribunal Procedures]].

Mark: /* Tribunal Results */

2019-04-23T04:34:42Z

Tribunal Results

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 == Tribunal Results ==
 ; Obligations to Tribunal: Phessalia of Merinita v. Covenant of Nova Semitae
@@ Line 63: / Line 80: @@
 : Phessalia of Merinita charges that magi of Nova Semitae have violated the Code by depriving her of her magical power (Merlin's Well incident)
 : VOTE: DISMISSED 3-44 (29 absentions)
 ; Apprentice Law: Stephen Eruditus of Jerbiton v. Phessalia of Merinita.
@@ Line 85: / Line 98: @@
 : VOTE: IN FAVOR OF COVENANT OF NOVA SEMITAE, 65-7 (4 abstensions)
 : PUNISHMENT: Phessalia is fined 1 rook of vis to be paid by the next Tribunal.
 ; Respect for Tribunal, Wizard's March: Cathaoire Ex Miscellanea, Quaesitor v. Sonnus of Flambeau
@@ Line 99: / Line 107: @@
 : Neanne of Verditius proposes a modification of Apprentice Law. A magus who is a blood relative of a Gifted child has precedence to claim the child for apprenticeship and a non-blood relative magus may not claim the Gifted child unless the blood relative recinds his claim first.  This ruling does not apply to the Right of Bonisagus magi to claim any apprentice they wish for their studies per the Oath.
 : VOTE: IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL 39-30 (8 abstentions)
 ; Tribunal Procedures: Julia of Jerbiton v. Talion of Flambeau, Praeco

Mark: /* Tribunal Results */

2015-06-28T23:01:40Z

Tribunal Results

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 28 June 2015
Line 74:		Line 74:
	; Apprentice Law, Deprivation of Power: Morgana of Merinita v. Perses of Tytalus		; Apprentice Law, Deprivation of Power: Morgana of Merinita v. Perses of Tytalus
	: Morgana of Merinita accuses Perses of Tytalus of robbing her of her magical power due to the kidnapping of her Gifted daughter who she intended to train and claim as her apprentice. Counter-claim: the Peripheral Code clearly states that apprenticeship begins when an apprentice’s Arts are opened, and this has not happened.		: Morgana of Merinita accuses Perses of Tytalus of robbing her of her magical power due to the kidnapping of her Gifted daughter who she intended to train and claim as her apprentice. Counter-claim: the Peripheral Code clearly states that apprenticeship begins when an apprentice’s Arts are opened, and this has not happened.
	: VOTE: DISMISSED 6-7 (63 abstentions)		: VOTE: DISMISSED 6-7 (63 abstentions) (see Apprentice Law: Magus Blood Rights, below)

	; Deprivation of Power: Covenant of Nova Semitae v. Phessalia of Merinita		; Deprivation of Power: Covenant of Nova Semitae v. Phessalia of Merinita

Mark: /* Tribunal Results */

2015-06-28T21:58:27Z

Tribunal Results

Mark: /* Tribunal Results */

2015-06-28T21:19:52Z

Tribunal Results

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 28 June 2015
Line 87:		Line 87:

	* Interference with Faeries: Trutina of Guernicus v. Eirlyn of Merinita		* Interference with Faeries: Trutina of Guernicus v. Eirlyn of Merinita
	: Quaesitor Trutina of Guernicus brings a case against Eirlyn of Merinita for bringing the wrath of the fae unto members of the Order. Eirlyn confesses to her actions and for the wrath of the fae unto her sodales, particularly the Redcaps who traverse the area in the course of their duties. She expressed regret at her actions and begged for the mercy of Tribunal.		: Quaesitor Trutina of Guernicus brings a case against Eirlyn of Merinita for bringing the wrath of the fae unto members of the Order. Eirlyn confesses to her actions and for bringing the wrath of the fae unto her sodales, particularly the Redcaps who traverse the area in the course of their duties. She expressed regret at her actions and begged for the mercy of Tribunal.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF TRUTINA OF GUERNICUS, 46-20 (10 absentions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF TRUTINA OF GUERNICUS, 46-20 (10 absentions)
	: PUNISHMENT: Eirlyn is ordered to create two items to assist the Redcaps in avoiding or dealing with the angry fae to be paid to Mercer House by the next Tribunal.		: PUNISHMENT: Eirlyn is ordered to create two items to assist the Redcaps in avoiding or dealing with the angry fae to be paid to Mercer House by the next Tribunal.
Line 94:		Line 94:
	: Cathaoire, Quaesitor Ex Miscellanea, reported that Sonnus of Flambeau had been convicted in the Tribunal of 1215 for interfering with Mundanes and had been ordered to provide the Redcaps with several devices to better avoid mundane notice in the areas where he caused problems. The Redcaps of Stonehenge report that he has not provided the items as ordered, and has not presented himself to Tribunal to answer for his actions. Recommendation: Expulsion from the Order and Wizard’s March.		: Cathaoire, Quaesitor Ex Miscellanea, reported that Sonnus of Flambeau had been convicted in the Tribunal of 1215 for interfering with Mundanes and had been ordered to provide the Redcaps with several devices to better avoid mundane notice in the areas where he caused problems. The Redcaps of Stonehenge report that he has not provided the items as ordered, and has not presented himself to Tribunal to answer for his actions. Recommendation: Expulsion from the Order and Wizard’s March.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF CATHAOIRE EX MISCELLANEA, QUAESITOR 62-0 (14 absentions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF CATHAOIRE EX MISCELLANEA, QUAESITOR 62-0 (14 absentions)
	: PUNISHMENT: Sonnus of Flambeau is Expelled from the Order of Hermes and hereby Wizard's ~~March~~. May God have mercy on his soul.		: PUNISHMENT: Sonnus of Flambeau is Expelled from the Order of Hermes and hereby Wizard's Marched. May God have mercy on his soul.

	* Apprentice Law: Magus Blood Rights		* Apprentice Law: Magus Blood Rights

Mark: /* Tribunal Results */

2015-06-28T21:11:27Z

Tribunal Results

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 == Tribunal Results ==
 [[Category: Ars Magica]]
 [[Category: Nova Semitae Saga]]

Mark at 19:01, 28 June 2015

2015-06-28T19:01:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 28 June 2015
Line 45:		Line 45:
	* Aulus of Bonisagus and Neanne of Verditius, both from Nova Semitae, organize a small colloquium for the scholastically-minded members to give lectures, share knowledge, and otherwise discuss magical theory and methods with other members. Due to a historical debacle in the Tribunal, the number of Bonisagus magi in the Tribunal is very low, so this event is not very well attended.		* Aulus of Bonisagus and Neanne of Verditius, both from Nova Semitae, organize a small colloquium for the scholastically-minded members to give lectures, share knowledge, and otherwise discuss magical theory and methods with other members. Due to a historical debacle in the Tribunal, the number of Bonisagus magi in the Tribunal is very low, so this event is not very well attended.
	* A general seller's market for enchantments, potions, books, longevity rituals, vis, and anything else magi will trade pops up. Very informal.		* A general seller's market for enchantments, potions, books, longevity rituals, vis, and anything else magi will trade pops up. Very informal.

			== Tribunal Results ==

	[[Category: Ars Magica]]		[[Category: Ars Magica]]
	[[Category: Nova Semitae Saga]]		[[Category: Nova Semitae Saga]]

Mark at 03:14, 25 June 2015

2015-06-25T03:14:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 25 June 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	In case you feel like reading about a standard Tribunal before the next game, there's an article on [[Tribunal Procedures]].		In case you feel like reading about a standard Tribunal before the next game, there's an article on [[Tribunal Procedures]].

			== Logistics ==

			* Since the entire covenant will be traveling to the Tribunal, Neanne has introduced a motion to have the mandatory Summer covenant meeting ahead of time (June 15 instead of June 20) and to let the covenfolk have their customary feast on the normal solstice day (June 21)
			* The distance from Nova Semitae to Blackthorn in the south of Wales is roughly 100 miles, according to the Redcaps
			* Travel is expected to take up to 5 days (20 miles/day) to travel to Blackthorn (June 16-20)
			* Pre-Tribunal Activities start whenever enough people show up and run until the evening of June 22nd
			* Tribunal begins at sunset on June 22nd and is expected to last for 2 nights
			* Post Tribunal Days and travel back home is June 24-29
			* For [[Obscurus Ignis]]: This period will run through these signs: Gemini (Air, June 16-20) and Cancer (Water, June 21-29).

	== Charges against Nova Semitae ==		== Charges against Nova Semitae ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 28 June 2015
Line 48:		Line 48:
	== Tribunal Results ==		== Tribunal Results ==

	* Obligations to Tribunal: Phessalia of Merinita v. Covenant of Nova Semitae		; Obligations to Tribunal: Phessalia of Merinita v. Covenant of Nova Semitae
	: Phessalia of Merinita charges that Nova Semitae has failed in its obligations to the Tribunal and that its vis sources, chattels, and wealth are claimable by Tribunal members (all covenant members responsible; Neanne will bear primary responsibility as the covenant Princeps)		: Phessalia of Merinita charges that Nova Semitae has failed in its obligations to the Tribunal and that its vis sources, chattels, and wealth are claimable by Tribunal members (all covenant members responsible; Neanne will bear primary responsibility as the covenant Princeps)
	: VOTE: DISMISSED 7-44 (25 absentions)		: VOTE: DISMISSED 7-44 (25 absentions)

	* Apprentice Law, Obligation of Masters: Phessalia of Merinita v. Adria of Jerbiton, Aidan of Merinita, Geoffrey of Jerbiton, Joshua of Verditius, Magni of Flambeau, Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Veloxia of Bjornaer, Thomas Ex Miscellanea		; Apprentice Law, Obligation of Masters: Phessalia of Merinita v. Adria of Jerbiton, Aidan of Merinita, Geoffrey of Jerbiton, Joshua of Verditius, Magni of Flambeau, Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Veloxia of Bjornaer, Thomas Ex Miscellanea
	: Phessalia of Merinita charges that the new magi of Nova Semitae are not verified magi who have sworn the Oath (Adria, Aidan, Geoffrey, Joshua, Magni, Obscurus Ignis, Veloxia, and Thomas)		: Phessalia of Merinita charges that the new magi of Nova Semitae are not verified magi who have sworn the Oath (Adria, Aidan, Geoffrey, Joshua, Magni, Obscurus Ignis, Veloxia, and Thomas)
	: VOTE: DISMISSED 3-44 (29 absentions)		: VOTE: DISMISSED 3-44 (29 absentions)

	* Certamen: Phessalia of Merinita v. Aidan of Merinita, Geoffrey of Jerbiton, Magni of Flambeau, Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Veloxia of Bjornaer		; Certamen: Phessalia of Merinita v. Aidan of Merinita, Geoffrey of Jerbiton, Magni of Flambeau, Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Veloxia of Bjornaer
	: Phessalia of Merinita charges that magi of Nova Semitae have violated the Code by not abiding by the results of Certamen (Merlin's Well incident)		: Phessalia of Merinita charges that magi of Nova Semitae have violated the Code by not abiding by the results of Certamen (Merlin's Well incident)
	: VOTE: DISMISSED 20-33 (23 absentions)		: VOTE: DISMISSED 20-33 (23 absentions)

	* Deprivation of Power: Phessalia of Merinita v. Aidan of Merinita, Geoffrey of Jerbiton, Magni of Flambeau, Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Veloxia of Bjornaer		; Deprivation of Power: Phessalia of Merinita v. Aidan of Merinita, Geoffrey of Jerbiton, Magni of Flambeau, Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Veloxia of Bjornaer
	: Phessalia of Merinita charges that magi of Nova Semitae have violated the Code by depriving her of her magical power (Merlin's Well incident)		: Phessalia of Merinita charges that magi of Nova Semitae have violated the Code by depriving her of her magical power (Merlin's Well incident)
	: VOTE: DISMISSED 3-44 (29 absentions)		: VOTE: DISMISSED 3-44 (29 absentions)

	* Interference with Mundanes: Phessalia of Merinita v. Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Magni of Flambeau		; Interference with Mundanes: Phessalia of Merinita v. Obscurus Ignis of Flambeau, Magni of Flambeau
	: Phessalia of Merinita charges that magi of Nova Semitae have violated the Code by exhibiting blatant magic in Wales (Viking Ghosts adventure) (Magni, Obscurus Ignis)		: Phessalia of Merinita charges that magi of Nova Semitae have violated the Code by exhibiting blatant magic in Wales (Viking Ghosts adventure) (Magni, Obscurus Ignis)
	: CASE REMANDED TO QUAESITORES FOR VERIFIATION		: CASE REMANDED TO QUAESITORES FOR VERIFIATION

	* Apprentice Law: Stephen Eruditus of Jerbiton v. Phessalia of Merinita.		; Apprentice Law: Stephen Eruditus of Jerbiton v. Phessalia of Merinita.
	: A Merinita maga of Libellus was killed by faeries in the course of her studies, leaving her apprentice without a master. Her amicus, Stephen Eruditus, claimed the apprentice to continue her training. Phessalia of Merinita claims that the apprentice would be better suited under a master of the same House, particular given the Mystery Cult that she belongs to. Neither wishes to settle the matter with Certamen as is customary, and so brought the matter to Tribunal		: A Merinita maga of Libellus was killed by faeries in the course of her studies, leaving her apprentice without a master. Her amicus, Stephen Eruditus, claimed the apprentice to continue her training. Phessalia of Merinita claims that the apprentice would be better suited under a master of the same House, particular given the Mystery Cult that she belongs to. Neither wishes to settle the matter with Certamen as is customary, and so brought the matter to Tribunal
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF STEPHEN ERUDITUS 14-13 (49 abstentions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF STEPHEN ERUDITUS 14-13 (49 abstentions)

	* Apprentice Law, Deprivation of Power: Morgana of Merinita v. Perses of Tytalus		; Apprentice Law, Deprivation of Power: Morgana of Merinita v. Perses of Tytalus
	: Morgana of Merinita accuses Perses of Tytalus of robbing her of her magical power due to the kidnapping of her Gifted daughter who she intended to train and claim as her apprentice. Counter-claim: the Peripheral Code clearly states that apprenticeship begins when an apprentice’s Arts are opened, and this has not happened.		: Morgana of Merinita accuses Perses of Tytalus of robbing her of her magical power due to the kidnapping of her Gifted daughter who she intended to train and claim as her apprentice. Counter-claim: the Peripheral Code clearly states that apprenticeship begins when an apprentice’s Arts are opened, and this has not happened.
	: VOTE: DISMISSED 6-7 (63 abstentions)		: VOTE: DISMISSED 6-7 (63 abstentions)

	* Deprivation of Power: Covenant of Nova Semitae v. Phessalia of Merinita		; Deprivation of Power: Covenant of Nova Semitae v. Phessalia of Merinita
	: Nova Semitae charges Phessalia of Merinita with deprivation of power due to her incessant and unlawful attempts to claim the covenant's registered and recognized vis sources, in particular Merlin's Well.		: Nova Semitae charges Phessalia of Merinita with deprivation of power due to her incessant and unlawful attempts to claim the covenant's registered and recognized vis sources, in particular Merlin's Well.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF COVENANT OF NOVA SEMITAE, 39-7 (30 abstensions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF COVENANT OF NOVA SEMITAE, 39-7 (30 abstensions)
	: PUNISHMENT: Phessalia is fined 2 years' worth of vis equivalent to the registered vis draw of Merlin's Well, to be paid by the next Tribunal.		: PUNISHMENT: Phessalia is fined 2 years' worth of vis equivalent to the registered vis draw of Merlin's Well, to be paid by the next Tribunal.

	* Respect for Tribunal: Covenant of Nova Semitae v. Phessalia of Merinita		; Respect for Tribunal: Covenant of Nova Semitae v. Phessalia of Merinita
	: Nova Semitae charges Phessalia of Merinita of mocking the Tribunal and wasting its time through frivolous cases and refusing to respect time-honored traditions for resolving disputes between magi prior to Tribunal.		: Nova Semitae charges Phessalia of Merinita of mocking the Tribunal and wasting its time through frivolous cases and refusing to respect time-honored traditions for resolving disputes between magi prior to Tribunal.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF COVENANT OF NOVA SEMITAE, 65-7 (4 abstensions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF COVENANT OF NOVA SEMITAE, 65-7 (4 abstensions)
	: PUNISHMENT: Phessalia is fined 1 rook of vis to be paid by the next Tribunal.		: PUNISHMENT: Phessalia is fined 1 rook of vis to be paid by the next Tribunal.

	* Interference with Faeries: Trutina of Guernicus v. Eirlyn of Merinita		; Interference with Faeries: Trutina of Guernicus v. Eirlyn of Merinita
	: Quaesitor Trutina of Guernicus brings a case against Eirlyn of Merinita for bringing the wrath of the fae unto members of the Order. Eirlyn confesses to her actions and for bringing the wrath of the fae unto her sodales, particularly the Redcaps who traverse the area in the course of their duties. She expressed regret at her actions and begged for the mercy of Tribunal.		: Quaesitor Trutina of Guernicus brings a case against Eirlyn of Merinita for bringing the wrath of the fae unto members of the Order. Eirlyn confesses to her actions and for bringing the wrath of the fae unto her sodales, particularly the Redcaps who traverse the area in the course of their duties. She expressed regret at her actions and begged for the mercy of Tribunal.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF TRUTINA OF GUERNICUS, 46-20 (10 absentions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF TRUTINA OF GUERNICUS, 46-20 (10 absentions)
	: PUNISHMENT: Eirlyn is ordered to create two items to assist the Redcaps in avoiding or dealing with the angry fae to be paid to Mercer House by the next Tribunal.		: PUNISHMENT: Eirlyn is ordered to create two items to assist the Redcaps in avoiding or dealing with the angry fae to be paid to Mercer House by the next Tribunal.

	* Respect for Tribunal, Wizard's March: Cathaoire Ex Miscellanea, Quaesitor v. Sonnus of Flambeau		; Respect for Tribunal, Wizard's March: Cathaoire Ex Miscellanea, Quaesitor v. Sonnus of Flambeau
	: Cathaoire, Quaesitor Ex Miscellanea, reported that Sonnus of Flambeau had been convicted in the Tribunal of 1215 for interfering with Mundanes and had been ordered to provide the Redcaps with several devices to better avoid mundane notice in the areas where he caused problems. The Redcaps of Stonehenge report that he has not provided the items as ordered, and has not presented himself to Tribunal to answer for his actions. Recommendation: Expulsion from the Order and Wizard’s March.		: Cathaoire, Quaesitor Ex Miscellanea, reported that Sonnus of Flambeau had been convicted in the Tribunal of 1215 for interfering with Mundanes and had been ordered to provide the Redcaps with several devices to better avoid mundane notice in the areas where he caused problems. The Redcaps of Stonehenge report that he has not provided the items as ordered, and has not presented himself to Tribunal to answer for his actions. Recommendation: Expulsion from the Order and Wizard’s March.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF CATHAOIRE EX MISCELLANEA, QUAESITOR 62-0 (14 absentions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF CATHAOIRE EX MISCELLANEA, QUAESITOR 62-0 (14 absentions)
	: PUNISHMENT: Sonnus of Flambeau is Expelled from the Order of Hermes and hereby Wizard's Marched. May God have mercy on his soul.		: PUNISHMENT: Sonnus of Flambeau is Expelled from the Order of Hermes and hereby Wizard's Marched. May God have mercy on his soul.

	* Apprentice Law: Magus Blood Rights		; Apprentice Law: Magus Blood Rights
	: Neanne of Verditius proposes a modification of Apprentice Law. A magus who is a blood relative of a Gifted child has precedence to claim the child for apprenticeship and a non-blood relative magus may not claim the Gifted child unless the blood relative recinds his claim first. This ruling does not apply to the Right of Bonisagus magi to claim any apprentice they wish for their studies per the Oath.		: Neanne of Verditius proposes a modification of Apprentice Law. A magus who is a blood relative of a Gifted child has precedence to claim the child for apprenticeship and a non-blood relative magus may not claim the Gifted child unless the blood relative recinds his claim first. This ruling does not apply to the Right of Bonisagus magi to claim any apprentice they wish for their studies per the Oath.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL 39-30 (8 abstentions)		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL 39-30 (8 abstentions)

	* Tribunal Pact: Punishing the Covenant of Horsingas of the Loch Leglean Tribunal and its allies		; Tribunal Pact: Punishing the Covenant of Horsingas of the Loch Leglean Tribunal and its allies
	: Due to decades of raiding by lowland Scottish covenants committing unlawful acts under Hermetic Law and the inability of that Tribunal to reign in its lawlessness, Aduro of Flambeau proposes a Tribunal-wide response. If this pact is passed, all covenants must provide at least one of the following: one magus to fight Wizard's War, 1 rook of vis, or 10 grogs to fight mercenaries and opposing grogs. Participating magi will simultaneously declare Wizard's War on each and every magus of the covenant of Horsingas and their Hermetic allies at a time to be determined by Aduro of Flambeau. Spoils of the Wizard War are to be collected up and divided by level of support donated to the cause by covenant.		: Due to decades of raiding by lowland Scottish covenants committing unlawful acts under Hermetic Law and the inability of that Tribunal to reign in its lawlessness, Aduro of Flambeau proposes a Tribunal-wide response. If this pact is passed, all covenants must provide at least one of the following: one magus to fight Wizard's War, 1 rook of vis, or 10 grogs to fight mercenaries and opposing grogs. Participating magi will simultaneously declare Wizard's War on each and every magus of the covenant of Horsingas and their Hermetic allies at a time to be determined by Aduro of Flambeau. Spoils of the Wizard War are to be collected up and divided by level of support donated to the cause by covenant.
	: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF THE PACT 50-26		: VOTE: IN FAVOR OF THE PACT 50-26

	* Tribunal Procedures: Julia of Jerbiton v. Talion of Flambeau, Praeco		; Tribunal Procedures: Julia of Jerbiton v. Talion of Flambeau, Praeco
	: Julia of Jerbiton requests that Tribunal sessions be relocated to another location rather than be held at the Covenant of Blackthorn.		: Julia of Jerbiton requests that Tribunal sessions be relocated to another location rather than be held at the Covenant of Blackthorn.
	: ISSUE REMANDED TO FUTURE TRIBUNAL		: ISSUE REMANDED TO FUTURE TRIBUNAL

	* Tribunal Procedures: Immanola, Primus House Ex Miscellanea v. Talion of Flambeau, Praeco		; Tribunal Procedures: Immanola, Primus House Ex Miscellanea v. Talion of Flambeau, Praeco
	: Immanola, Primus House Ex Miscellanea declares that she is the eldest magus of the Tribunal and by tradition ought to be Praeco. She charges that Talion of Flambeau has usurped her position as Praeco and demands a vote to have him removed and her reinstated as Praeco of the Stonehenge Tribunal.		: Immanola, Primus House Ex Miscellanea declares that she is the eldest magus of the Tribunal and by tradition ought to be Praeco. She charges that Talion of Flambeau has usurped her position as Praeco and demands a vote to have him removed and her reinstated as Praeco of the Stonehenge Tribunal.
	: ISSUE REMANDED TO FUTURE TRIBUNAL		: ISSUE REMANDED TO FUTURE TRIBUNAL